Why the Downturn in the Financial Markets Could Be Good News For IRA Owners

I don't know of too many people that weremay never make another cent off of this thing,
happy watching their investments "tank" alonghe wants to get his "licks" in while he still can.
with the financial markets. Heck, some closeWhenever the investment markets are real high
friends of mine didn't even look at any of theirlike they were a few years ago it would cost
mutual fund/brokerage statements for the pastmore money in taxes to convert an IRA. For
few months. They went from the mailbox to theexample if your IRA was worth $100,000 in 2006,
"circular file," and while I didn't go that farit would cost a little over $20,000 to convert an
personally, reading the "red ink" didn't exactlyIRA to a Roth IRA if you are in the 25% tax
make me jump for joy either.bracket and your income for the year, including
At Halas Consulting, we don't just focus on ourthe conversion was about $77,000 (note: this
clients' investments, we also focus on risknumber is a rough estimate of the tax liability, it
management, and tax planning and preparation,doesn't take into account any extraordinary
and it's on the tax planning side that wefactors that may be present in your individual tax
discovered the huge opportunity that an IRAsituation.)
owner can take advantage of if he/she is a longIf however, you decided to convert your
term thinker.traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in the 2008 tax
As much as I like Traditional IRAs, I absolutelyyear, and your $100,000 IRA is now worth
LOVE Roth IRAs; after all how could I not? Who$65,930 because it was invested in the S&P
wouldn't like totally tax free money at retirement,500 Index, which was down 34.07% as of the
or even after just 5 years from when youend of October 2008, your tax liability would be
opened the account if you happen to be olderabout $13,449.72 figuring everything else
than 59 1/2 at that time? If you're under 59 1/2remained the same. Maybe that's still a bit too
you can take your money out without tax liabilitymuch for you, but would you be in favor of
up to the amount you invested, you have to waitconverting half of your Traditional IRA to a Roth
till you're 59 1/2 to take out the growth amount.IRA? If so, a $32,965 conversion (half of
Once you reach age 70 1/2 you MUST start$65,930) would cost you about $6724.86 in taxes.
taking required minimum distributions (RMDs) fromWhen the market goes back up again, and it
a Traditional IRA, whether you need them or not.always has historically, you'll then have the
This isn't the case with a Roth IRA, you can takeamount that you started with (or more) AND
money out if you wish, or if you want to leaveyou'll potentially NEVER have to pay taxes on that
the money in to grow because you decided tomoney again, nor will the government be able to
work a few more years, go right ahead. In short,tell you that you have to take a certain amount
if you like flexibility AND saving money on a taxevery year after you turn age 70 1/2!
advantaged basis, a Roth IRA is hard to beat.If this idea is of interest to you, I recommend
Now, you may be wondering, what does thedoing it, or discussing the idea with your tax or
aforementioned Roth IRA discussion have to dofinancial advisor as soon as possible. April 14, 2009
with the crappy investment markets that we'veis NOT the time that you want to implement the
been having lately? I'm glad you asked. You see,process as then it will be too late. If you like the
when I have clients that have IRAs, one of theidea but don't feel confident doing it yourself, and
first things I like to do is find out how we candon't currently have a financial advisor, feel free
convert those rascals to Roth IRAs as soon asto contact me at the email address listed below
possible. The only "bug" in this particular soup isand we can explore the possibility further and see
that there is a tax liability to the IRA owner if heif it makes sense for you.
she converts to a Roth IRA. Since Uncle Sam